ADHD
Epidemiology
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2005) conducted the National Survey of Children’s
Health during January 2003Y2004, asking parents of
more than 100,000 children ages 4 to 17 years whether
their child had ever been diagnosed with ADHD or
received medication treatment (as opposed to currently
being treated). The rate of lifetime childhood diagnosis
of ADHD was 7.8%, whereas 4.3% (or only 55% of
those with ADHD) had ever been treated with
medication for the disorder
Although only
40% of 18- to 20-year-old Bgrown up^ ADHD
patients met the full criteria for ADHD
Comorbidities
Studies have shown that 54%Y84% of
children and adolescents with ADHD may meet criteria
for oppositional defiant disorder (ODD); a significant
portion of these patients will develop conduct disorder
Etiology
Specifically, a meta-analysis of
83 studies with more than 6,000 subjects showed that
patients with ADHD have impairments in the executive
functioning domains of response inhibition, vigilance,
working memory, and some measures of planning.
Faraone et al. (2005b) reviewed 20 independent
twin studies that estimated the heritability (the
amount of phenotypic variance of symptoms attributed
to genetic factors) to be 76%.
Faraone et al. (2005b) identified eight genes in which
the same variant was studied in three or more studies;
seven of which showed statistically significant evidence
of association with ADHD (the dopamine 4 and 5
receptors, the dopamine transporter, the enzyme
dopamine "-hydroxylase, the serotonin transporter
gene, the serotonin 1B receptor, and the synaptosomalassociated
protein 25 gene).
Screening
The clinician should perform a detailed interview with
the parent about each of the 18 ADHDsymptoms listed in
DSM-IV. For each symptom, the clinician should
determine whether it is present as well as its duration,
severity, and frequency
Children suffering a severe head injury may develop
symptoms of ADHD, usually of the inattentive
subtype. Hyperthyroidism,
which can be associated with hyperactivity and
agitation, rarely presents with ADHD symptoms
alone but with other signs and symptoms of excessive
thyroid hormone levels.
Academic impairment is commonly due to the ADHD
itself. However, if there is no clear evidence of an
improvement in academic performance in 1 to 2 months
despite improvement of the ADHD, then psychological
testing for learning disorders is indicated
Treatment
It is also clear that behavior therapy alone
can produce improvement in ADHD symptoms
relative to baseline symptoms or to wait-list controls
Jadad et al. (1999)
reviewed 78 studies of the treatment of ADHD; six of
these studies compared pharmacological and nonpharmacological
interventions. The reviewers reported that
studies consistently supported the superiority of
stimulant over the nondrug treatment. Twenty studies
compared combination therapy with a stimulant or
with psychosocial intervention, but no evidence of an
additive benefit of combination therapy was found.
In the MTA study, children with ADHD were
randomized to four groups: algorithmic medication
treatment alone, psychosocial treatment alone, a
combination of algorithmic medication management
and psychosocial treatment, and community treatment.
Algorithmic medication treatment consisted of
monthly appointments in which the dose of medication
was carefully titrated according to parent and teacher
rating scales. Children in all four treatment groups
showed reduced symptoms of ADHD at 14 months
relative to baseline. The two groups that received
algorithmic medication management showed a superior
outcome with regard to ADHD symptoms compared
with those that received intensive behavioral treatment
alone or community treatment (MTA Cooperative
Group, 1999a [rct]).
Behavior therapy may be
recommended as an initial treatment if the patient’s
ADHD symptoms are mild with minimal impairment,
the diagnosis of ADHD is uncertain, parents reject
medication treatment, or there is marked disagreement
about the diagnosis between parents or between parents
and teachers.
Treatment
The physician is free to choose any of the two
stimulant types (MPH or amphetamine) because
evidence suggests the two are equally efficacious in
the treatment of ADHD.
Single daily dosing is associated with greater
compliance for all types of medication, and long-acting
MPH may improve driving performance in adolescents
relative to short-acting MPH (Cox et al., 2004 [rct]).
Physicians may use long-acting forms as initial
treatment; there is no need to titrate to the appropriate
dose on short-acting forms and then Btransfer^ children
to a long-acting form. Short-acting stimulants are often
used as initial treatment in small children (<16>
weight), for whom there are no long-acting forms in a
sufficiently low dose.
On average, there is
a linear relationship between dose and clinical response:
that is, in any group of ADHD subjects, more subjects
will be classified as responders and there is a greater
reduction in symptoms at the higher doses of stimulant.
There is no evidence of a global Btherapeutic^ window
in ADHD patients. Each patient, however, has a unique
dose-response curve.
After selecting the starting dose, the physician may
titrate upward every 1 to 3 weeks until the maximum
dose for the stimulant is reached, symptoms of ADHD
remit, or side effects prevent further titration, whichever
occurs first
Eight of the nine studies supported the efficacy of MPH
in the treatment of preschoolers with ADHD at
milligram-per-kilogram doses that were comparable
with those used in school-age children
Of note, only 37 of 279 enrolled
parents thought that the behavior training resulted in
significant or satisfactory improvement
Results from the short-term, open-label, run-in and
double-blind, crossover studies do show that MPH is
effective in preschoolers with ADHD (Greenhill et al.,
2006a). The mean optimal dose of MPH was found to
be 0.7 T 0.4 mg/kg/day, which is lower than the mean
of 1.0 mg/kg/day found to be optimal in the MTA
study with school-age children
Atomoxetine is a noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor
that is superior to placebo in the treatment of ADHD in
children, adolescents, and adults
Michelson et al. (2002) showed that although
atomoxetine was superior to placebo at week 1 of the
trial, the greatest effects were observed at week 6,
suggesting the patient should be maintained at the full
therapeutic dose for at least several weeks to obtain the
drug’s full effect. At the end of the treatment period,
atomoxetine led to a significant reduction in ratings of
symptoms of both ADHD and anxiety relative to
placebo, showing the drug to be efficacious in the
treatment of both conditions.
in a meta-analysis of atomoxetine and stimulant studies,
the effect size for atomoxetine was 0.62 compared with
0.91 and 0.95 for immediate-release and long-acting
stimulants, respectively
Bupropion is a noradrenergic antidepressant
that showed modest efficacy in the treatment of
ADHD in one double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
(Conners et al., 1996 [rct]). It is contraindicated in
patients with a current seizure disorder. It can be given in
either immediate-release or long-acting form, but may
not come in pill sizes small enough for children who
weigh <25>
A
gradual titration is required and clinical consensus
suggests the !-agonists are more successful in treating
hyperactive/impulsive symptoms than inattention
symptoms, In recent years clinical consensus has led to the use of clonidine as adjunctive therapy to treat tics
or stimulant-induced insomnia rather than as a primary
treatment for ADHD.
For stimulant medications, the most common side
effects are appetite decrease, weight loss, insomnia, or
headache. Less common side effects of stimulants
include tics and emotional lability/irritability.
If the patient’s ADHD
symptoms respond adequately only to a stimulant
medication that induces tics, then combined pharmacotherapy
of the stimulant and an !-agonist (clonidine
or guanfacine) is recommended (Tourette’s Syndrome)
Controlled trials of stimulants do not support the
widespread belief that stimulant medications induce
aggression. Indeed, overall aggressive acts and antisocial
behavior decline when ADHD patients are treated with
stimulants
In 12 controlled trials involving
1,357 patients taking atomoxetine and 851
taking placebo, the average risk of suicidal thinking
was 4/1,000 in the atomoxetine-treated group versus
none in those taking placebo.
examined all of the available
data and concluded that stimulant treatment may be
associated with a reduction in expected height gain, at
least in the first 1 to 3 years of treatment
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario